- Join Our Company
- Email: sanjay@pjnetworks.com
- Phone: +91-9818361787
Search for firewall as a service pricing in India and you will find very few real numbers. That is not evasion by the whole industry, or not only that. It is because the single figure that determines the cost — how much traffic you actually need to inspect — is the one thing no vendor knows before someone measures it. What follows is what the price is actually made of, so you can read a quote properly and tell a serious one from a guess.
Firewall throughput is not one number. A datasheet headline figure is measured with most of the security processing switched off — large packets, no deep inspection, no TLS decryption. Turn on the features you are buying the firewall for and usable capacity falls a long way below that headline. How far depends on which features, on your traffic mix, and on how much of your traffic is encrypted.
So a published price against a model number tells you almost nothing, because the model number tells you almost nothing. Two organisations with identical link speeds can need different appliances depending on how much TLS inspection they require and how many concurrent sessions they run. This is why our NGFW sizing guide spends most of its length on real throughput rather than on catalogue figures.
The practical consequence of guessing is predictable and common: an undersized box is deployed, it runs hot, and the fix applied under pressure is to switch inspection features off until it copes. The organisation is then paying for capability it has disabled.
Five things drive the number. Any quote that does not make these visible is hiding at least one of them.
Appliance class. Set by inspected throughput and concurrent sessions at that site, not by the speed of the internet link. A 1 Gbps link does not imply a 1 Gbps firewall requirement, in either direction.
Subscriptions. Intrusion prevention, application control, web filtering, anti-malware and sandboxing are licensed separately by most vendors. Which of them you genuinely need is a real conversation; buying the full bundle everywhere is a common way to overspend, and buying the base licence only is a common way to end up with an expensive router.
Number of sites, and how different they are. Ten identical retail branches cost far less per site than three sites with different topologies, because the policy work is done once and repeated.
Service depth. Monitoring only, monitoring with change management, or fully managed including firmware and failover testing. This is the widest variable between quotes that otherwise look alike, and it is usually the reason two proposals differ substantially.
High availability. A second appliance for failover roughly doubles the hardware element at that site. Whether a site warrants one is a business decision about downtime, not a technical default.
The comparison people usually run is the purchase price against twelve months of service, which flatters the purchase because it counts only one side of the ledger. A fair comparison includes the parts of ownership that arrive later.
Against a purchase, count: the appliance, the initial subscriptions, implementation, and then annual subscription renewals for the life of the box, support or AMC, the engineer time to run changes and firmware, and the replacement at end of life. Also count the sizing risk — if the box is specified wrongly, that is a capital write-off, and in our experience it is the single most expensive mistake in the category.
Against a service, count the recurring fee, and check what it includes. The sizing risk moves to the provider, which is worth something real: if we specify the wrong model, replacing it is our problem.
We have written the commercial case out in more detail in firewall rental versus purchase, and the ongoing-support half is covered in firewall AMC services.
Three recur often enough to plan for.
Subscription renewal shock. First-year bundles are frequently discounted in a way that renewals are not. Ask what year two and year three cost, in writing, before signing year one.
The rule base nobody maintained. Policies accumulate. Permissive rules added during a migration outlive their purpose because nobody can prove what removing them will break, and eventually someone has to pay for a rule review to untangle it. A service with change control included avoids most of this by never letting it accumulate.
End of life. Hardware reaches a date after which it stops receiving firmware. That is a capital event on an owned box and a non-event on a service, where replacement is the provider’s obligation.
Ask for these, and be suspicious of a proposal that arrives without them.
A sizing basis — the traffic figures the recommendation rests on, and whether they were measured or estimated. A per-site breakdown rather than one blended number. Subscriptions itemised, so you can see what you are actually licensing. A clear statement of what the service does and does not include, particularly around change requests. Renewal pricing for the full term, not just year one. And the exit position: what happens to the policy and the hardware if you leave.
We do not publish a rate card, and we would rather say why than pretend it is confidential. A number quoted before anyone has looked at your traffic is a guess dressed as a proposal, and the usual outcome of that guess is the undersized box described above.
What we do instead: measure what you actually push at each site with inspection enabled, size against that, tell you which delivery model fits — including the cases where a cloud-native platform suits you better than anything we would run — and then put a number against it that holds for the term. If the honest answer is that you should keep the appliances you already own and simply buy the operating cover, we will say that too.
The full scope, including where inspection sits in each delivery model and who owns which part of the lifecycle, is on our Firewall as a Service page. If you would rather start from hardware without capital outlay, firewall on rent covers the rental route.